Joined
·
9,895 Posts
Link to UK gear and diff ratios :
http://www.roadster-nc.com/2013/07/roadster-transmission-drivetrain.html
I will quite happily stick my neck out here and suggest that in a real life road driving situation you will not find any real difference in the driving experience.
Any theoretical gains in acceleration with the lower ratio diff are simply offset by a higher ratio in the gearbox gearing, any and all road tests that I have seen of the five and six speed cars show no performance differences, I'm sure that there may well be a tenth here or there to be gained or lost at some given point in the rev range between the two cars but sufficient to start thinking about swapping gearboxes around to make theoretical performance gains? No chance far to much work involved for no real world gain of deficit.
As I suggest if you are looking for something that will provide a real life performance gain then a simple BBR Super 175 kit would be the way to go. Prior to installing the charger to the GM I did run it for a while with what was in effect the Super 175 conversion and that reall made a huge difference to the car, it really freed it up and made an already willing to rev engine even more willing to rev.
Also worth bearing in mind that there are differences between the NC1 & NC2 onward 2.0 engine that give it another 500rpm before the redline and limiter, that of course equates to more spees available in each gear for the 2.0 litre NC2 onward.
My view on the gearboxes is straight forward enough, if you start mismatching gearboxes and diffs i.e. a diff from a five speed with a six speed box or a diff from a six speed with a five speed box then you will have an inaccurate speedo and will start playing around with the fuel consumption. If you are tracking the car, then the six speed box is the sturdier box so that would be my choice.
For road use, leave the gearbox and diffs matched up as they left the factory, as stated in real life driving you will not notice the difference and you won't feel that you are missing out on anything for the lack of that one intermediate gear, the engine has sufficient power and torque in the right places to ensure that this is the case. What is often not understood is that there is a lot of time and effort put into the calculations to determine the optimum ratios for engine power/torque curves the weight of the car and resulting performance figures. In fact you will more than likely find that the manufacturer will have a desired performance criteria right at the start of the design process, the Engineers then do the required calculations to determine the gear ratios required to give the desired performance. There is no guesswork involved when it comes to the gearbox and final drive ratios.
http://www.roadster-nc.com/2013/07/roadster-transmission-drivetrain.html
I will quite happily stick my neck out here and suggest that in a real life road driving situation you will not find any real difference in the driving experience.
Any theoretical gains in acceleration with the lower ratio diff are simply offset by a higher ratio in the gearbox gearing, any and all road tests that I have seen of the five and six speed cars show no performance differences, I'm sure that there may well be a tenth here or there to be gained or lost at some given point in the rev range between the two cars but sufficient to start thinking about swapping gearboxes around to make theoretical performance gains? No chance far to much work involved for no real world gain of deficit.
As I suggest if you are looking for something that will provide a real life performance gain then a simple BBR Super 175 kit would be the way to go. Prior to installing the charger to the GM I did run it for a while with what was in effect the Super 175 conversion and that reall made a huge difference to the car, it really freed it up and made an already willing to rev engine even more willing to rev.
Also worth bearing in mind that there are differences between the NC1 & NC2 onward 2.0 engine that give it another 500rpm before the redline and limiter, that of course equates to more spees available in each gear for the 2.0 litre NC2 onward.
My view on the gearboxes is straight forward enough, if you start mismatching gearboxes and diffs i.e. a diff from a five speed with a six speed box or a diff from a six speed with a five speed box then you will have an inaccurate speedo and will start playing around with the fuel consumption. If you are tracking the car, then the six speed box is the sturdier box so that would be my choice.
For road use, leave the gearbox and diffs matched up as they left the factory, as stated in real life driving you will not notice the difference and you won't feel that you are missing out on anything for the lack of that one intermediate gear, the engine has sufficient power and torque in the right places to ensure that this is the case. What is often not understood is that there is a lot of time and effort put into the calculations to determine the optimum ratios for engine power/torque curves the weight of the car and resulting performance figures. In fact you will more than likely find that the manufacturer will have a desired performance criteria right at the start of the design process, the Engineers then do the required calculations to determine the gear ratios required to give the desired performance. There is no guesswork involved when it comes to the gearbox and final drive ratios.